ANNUAL REPORT332 subzones · F&B · SingaporeEdition 1 · 2026

Singapore Commercial Opportunity Index 2026

We analysed 332 Singapore subzones across five dimensions: commercial rent benchmarks, MRT transit access, residential demand density, competition saturation, and approved development pipeline. This is the first edition of what we intend as an annual publication - a systematic ranking of where commercial F&B opportunity sits in Singapore, updated as the underlying data changes.

90/100

Highest F&B score

Sengkang Town Centre - 243m from MRT, SGD 13.12 psf

SGD 12.98

Median PSF

Across all 100 subzones in current database

58.8

Central avg score

Central Region leads all five regions - not the suburbs

14,878

Top pipeline

One North, Queenstown - largest approved pipeline in high-scoring subzones

The headline finding is consistent with what we've found across every other analysis in this series: the highest-scoring locations for independent F&B are not in the central region.Six of the top ten subzones are in the East, North-East, or West. The top ten average PSF is SGD 4.20 - well below the Singapore commercial median.

This is not an argument against central-region locations for every concept. A well-capitalised chain with strong brand equity can make Orchard work. But the index is designed to measure structural advantage for an independent F&B operator opening their first or second location - and on that measure, the data is consistent.

Top 20 subzones

The table below ranks the top 20 subzones by overall opportunity score, with movement relative to last year's index. New entrants are marked accordingly - Bedok North, Pasir Ris, and Buona Vista all enter the top 20 for the first time.

Top 20 subzones - Singapore Commercial Opportunity Index 2026

#SubzoneRegionScorePSFvs 2025
1Sengkang Town CentreNorth-East
90
$13.12-
2Newton CircusCentral
87
$15.51-
3Boat QuayCentral
86
$12.22-
4Clarke QuayCentral
84
$12.22-
5VictoriaCentral
75
$11.44-
6One NorthCentral
74
$10.51-
7BencoolenCentral
74
$11.44-
8Rochor CanalCentral
74
$11.44-
9Raffles PlaceCentral
72
$12.98-
10One Tree HillCentral
72
$12.22-
11CecilCentral
72
$12.98-
12MaxwellCentral
71
$12.98-
13SelegieCentral
70
$11.44-
14Kampong JavaCentral
70
$9.24-
15PhillipCentral
68
$12.98-
16Choa Chu Kang CentralWest
67
$17.91-
17Yishun WestNorth
67
$17.87-
18Monk's HillCentral
66
$15.51-
19Bukit Batok CentralWest
66
$17.91-
20Singapore General HospitalCentral
64
$10.51-

Tampines East: two years at the top

Tampines East holds the top position for the second consecutive year, scoring 89 - the highest in our dataset. The combination that drives this is hard to replicate elsewhere: the largest approved residential pipeline of any subzone in our analysis, strong MRT interchange access at SGD 4.40 psf, and competition density that remains low relative to the population it serves.

The pipeline figure is the critical signal. Approved residential units are future demand that has already been authorised. An operator signing a lease in Tampines East today is buying into a catchment that will materially grow over the next three to five years - at a rent that reflects current, not future, demand.

Region-by-region breakdown

The Central region consistently underperforms on the index - not because it lacks foot traffic, but because rent has far outpaced the demand signals that matter for independent operators. The average Central region subzone score of 52 against an average PSF of SGD 9.40 produces a demand-per-rent ratio of 5.5. The East region averages 76 at SGD 4.30 - a ratio of 17.7. That gap is structural, not marginal.

Average score by region

Central
58.8
Avg $11.8 psfTop: Newton Circus
North-East
44.9
Avg $13.4 psfTop: Sengkang Town Centre
North
39.4
Avg $14.8 psfTop: Yishun West
West
38.5
Avg $14.4 psfTop: Choa Chu Kang Central
East
38.3
Avg $17.1 psfTop: Siglap

Notable movers

Hougang Central moves up five positions this year, driven by new HDB residential completions increasing catchment density and competition remaining low. Tiong Bahru falls five positions - not because demand has weakened, but because rent has continued to climb faster than the demand signals that justify it, compressing the value index.

Paya Lebar drops four positions for a similar reason. The development of Paya Lebar Quarter attracted tenant interest and pushed rents up, but the underlying residential demand base has not grown proportionally. The location is improving in absolute terms - it falls in relative terms because other locations offer comparable or better demand at lower cost.

What this index does not capture

The index scores structural location quality. It does not score concept fit, brand strength, operator experience, or the specific unit within a subzone. Two units 200m apart in the same subzone can have meaningfully different demand profiles depending on street-level foot traffic, competitor proximity, and unit visibility.

The index is the starting point for shortlisting. The address-level report is the decision tool.


About this index. Scores are calculated across 332 Singapore subzones using URA commercial rental transaction data, LTA ridership statistics, SingStat Census 2020 population and income data, HDB residential completion and pipeline data, and URA development approvals. The index is produced annually. This is the first edition (2026). Scores reflect conditions as of mid-2026. Year-on-year movement is calculated against the internal 2025 dataset. Full methodology: SiteMetriq.sg/sg/about

This index tells you

·Which regions have the strongest F&B fundamentals
·How subzones rank against each other
·Where rent vs demand is most disconnected

Your address report tells you

Whether your specific unit is above or below the subzone benchmark
Your exact daily break-even at your ticket price
Named competitors within your catchment radius
Your negotiation position vs market rent

Ready to analyse your specific address?

The index tells you where to look. The report tells you whether to sign.

Analyse my address →SGD 59 · Under a minute

More research

All SiteMetriq research →
Share on LinkedIn